Trauma-informed psychotherapy for adults and couples
Change The Script UK - Specialising in PTSD, complex trauma, attachment wounds, and long-standing coping patterns.
Change The Script UK - Specialising in PTSD, complex trauma, attachment wounds, and long-standing coping patterns.
I work with adults affected by childhood trauma, PTSD, and complex trauma, where long-standing survival responses continue to shape daily life. My approach is trauma-informed and carefully paced, supporting the nervous system to move out of survival mode and towards lasting change.
I work with adults who experience repeated patterns in relationships, such as difficulty trusting, closeness, or emotional safety. Attachment-focused therapy helps make sense of how these patterns formed and supports steadier, more secure ways of relating.
I work with adults affected by trauma, including PTSD, addiction, and long-standing coping patterns. My work is trauma-informed, relational, and carefully paced, supporting sustainable change where previous therapy has not helped.
I lead Change The Script UK as an owner-led practice and previously spent 19 years as a frontline medic with the London Ambulance Service. An initial consultation offers space to explore whether this approach feels right.
Carl Jung

Therapy at Change The Script UK is a structured, collaborative process designed for work that is often complex, trauma-based, and long-standing. Sessions provide a steady, well-boundaried space to explore the patterns, responses, and experiences that have shaped how you cope, particularly where previous approaches have not brought lasting change.
My work is relational and integrative, guided by the pace and needs of each individual rather than a fixed formula. Together, we focus not only on insight, but on how your nervous system responds to stress, safety, and connection, helping you make sense of your experiences in a way that supports real change over time.
Therapy is confidential. What you share remains private, with the usual ethical and legal limits relating to serious risk of harm.
Beginning therapy is a meaningful commitment, both emotionally and financially. This work can be challenging at times, and progress is rarely linear. However, when approached with care, structure, and consistency, these moments often form the foundation for deeper, more sustainable change.
Donald Winnicott
Sessions are offered online across the UK and internationally, with in-person appointments available where appropriate.
A brief telephone or video consultation to explore what you’re looking for and whether this way of working feels like the right fit.
Therapy here is focused on complex, trauma-based work and is structured to support depth, safety, and sustainable change.
If you’re considering therapy and would like to explore whether this way of working feels right for you, you’re welcome to get in touch. The first step is a brief initial consultation, where we can talk through what’s bringing you here and whether Change the Script UK is the right fit for your needs.
If it’s helpful to speak by phone, this can be arranged as part of the initial consultation process. Tel: 07989 309324



Lately, there seems to be a growing debate around what some people call “therapy speak.”
Words like trauma, narcissist, gaslighting, boundaries, toxic, triggered, and attachment style have become part of everyday conversation in a way that would have been unusual even a few years ago.
On one hand, that feels important.
Many psychological con
Lately, there seems to be a growing debate around what some people call “therapy speak.”
Words like trauma, narcissist, gaslighting, boundaries, toxic, triggered, and attachment style have become part of everyday conversation in a way that would have been unusual even a few years ago.
On one hand, that feels important.
Many psychological concepts have become more accessible. People are finding language for experiences they may never previously have understood. Conversations about mental health, trauma, and relationships are happening more openly than ever before.
On the other hand, there are understandable concerns about how these terms are sometimes used online.
Complex psychological concepts can become simplified into short videos, memes, or soundbites. Labels can be applied quickly. Nuance can get lost. Human behaviour can start to look far more straightforward than it really is.
The reality is that most psychological concepts sit in shades of grey.
Not every difficult relationship involves narcissism.
Not every disagreement is gaslighting.
Not every uncomfortable experience is trauma.
But equally, these experiences do exist, and for many people finding the right language can be an important part of making sense of what they have lived through.
Perhaps the challenge isn't whether these words should be used, but how we use them.
With curiosity rather than certainty.
With context rather than assumptions.
And with enough humility to recognise that a social media post can introduce an idea, but rarely captures the full complexity of a person's story.
The conversations themselves aren't the problem.
The risk is forgetting that behind every psychological term is a human being, and human beings are rarely as simple as the labels we give them.

There has been a lot of discussion recently about AI and therapy.
Some people see it as a breakthrough. Others see it as a threat.
The reality, as is often the case, is probably more complicated than either position allows.
AI can provide information, reflection, prompts, and a space to organise thoughts. For some people, it may even feel ea
There has been a lot of discussion recently about AI and therapy.
Some people see it as a breakthrough. Others see it as a threat.
The reality, as is often the case, is probably more complicated than either position allows.
AI can provide information, reflection, prompts, and a space to organise thoughts. For some people, it may even feel easier to open up to a screen than another human being.
That shouldn't be dismissed.
But therapy is not simply the exchange of information.
In trauma work especially, healing rarely comes from insight alone.
Many people already understand why they think, feel, or react the way they do. The difficulty is not a lack of knowledge. It's that the nervous system continues to respond as though old dangers are still present.
Therapy involves something more than explanation.
It is a relationship.
It is being met by another person.
It is the experience of safety, consistency, curiosity, and connection over time.
These are things that technology may support, but not fully replace.
At the same time, I don't think the question is whether AI is "good" or "bad" for mental health.
The more interesting question may be:
What are people seeking from AI that they have struggled to find elsewhere?
Understanding?
Privacy?
Accessibility?
A space to think without fear of judgement?
Those are questions worth paying attention to.
Technology will continue to evolve.
The human need to feel seen, understood, and connected is unlikely to disappear.
Perhaps the future isn't about choosing between the two, but understanding where each has a place.

Attachment theory has become one of the most talked-about concepts in relationships.
It's not unusual now to hear people describe themselves as anxious, avoidant, secure, or disorganised.
Sometimes that language can be helpful.
It can offer a framework for understanding patterns that have felt confusing for years.
But I sometimes wonder wheth
Attachment theory has become one of the most talked-about concepts in relationships.
It's not unusual now to hear people describe themselves as anxious, avoidant, secure, or disorganised.
Sometimes that language can be helpful.
It can offer a framework for understanding patterns that have felt confusing for years.
But I sometimes wonder whether attachment styles are becoming something we identify with, rather than something we become curious about.
Attachment theory was never intended to place people into fixed categories.
It was intended to help us understand how early experiences of connection, safety, consistency, and care can shape the way we relate to others later in life.
How we respond to closeness.
How we navigate conflict.
How we experience trust.
How we manage distance.
In therapy, attachment patterns often make sense when viewed through the lens of adaptation.
The person who struggles to trust may have learned that trust wasn't always safe.
The person who fears abandonment may have experienced relationships that felt unpredictable or inconsistent.
The person who pulls away when things become emotionally close may be protecting themselves from something that once felt overwhelming.
These responses can create difficulties in adult relationships.
But they rarely emerge without reason.
Perhaps the value of attachment theory isn't in deciding what "type" of person we are.
Perhaps it's in helping us understand the stories our relationships have taught us about connection, safety, and belonging.
And recognising that those stories, while powerful, are not necessarily permanent.

There are moments in history when uncertainty feels impossible to ignore.
The headlines change by the hour. Technology is evolving faster than many of us can keep up with. Financial pressures continue to affect families, workplaces are changing, and many people describe carrying a background sense that life feels... heavier than it used to
There are moments in history when uncertainty feels impossible to ignore.
The headlines change by the hour. Technology is evolving faster than many of us can keep up with. Financial pressures continue to affect families, workplaces are changing, and many people describe carrying a background sense that life feels... heavier than it used to.
You don't have to watch the news all day to be affected by it. Our nervous systems are constantly taking in information from the world around us. Long before we consciously decide whether something feels threatening, our bodies are already responding to cues of safety and danger.
This is particularly true for people who have experienced trauma.
When the nervous system has learned that the world can become unpredictable, overwhelming, or unsafe, periods of uncertainty often feel disproportionately difficult. Not because something is "wrong", but because uncertainty itself has become a cue that the body recognises.
This is one of the reasons why people sometimes say:
"Nothing terrible is happening in my life right now... so why do I still feel on edge?"
The answer is rarely simple. Sometimes the body isn't responding to today. It's responding to yesterday.
Trauma has a way of collapsing time. The nervous system doesn't always distinguish between past danger and present uncertainty. It prepares for what it has learned might happen. That preparation can look like many different things. Hypervigilance, difficulty sleeping, feeling emotionally overwhelmed, finding it hard to switch off, overthinking, becoming increasingly irritable or simply feeling exhausted by carrying an invisible sense of alertness throughout the day.
One of the misconceptions about healing is that it means never feeling anxious again. It doesn't. A healthy nervous system still responds to challenge and uncertainty. The difference is that it can also recognise when the danger has passed. Trauma recovery isn't about becoming unaffected by life.
It's about increasing our capacity to return to safety after we have been activated. That process isn't usually dramatic. It happens gradually. Through relationships that feel consistent. Through experiences that challenge old expectations. Through moments where the nervous system discovers that it no longer has to remain permanently prepared for impact.
As a therapist, I don't believe our goal is to eliminate uncertainty. Life has never offered that guarantee. Perhaps the work is learning how to remain connected to ourselves even when the world around us feels unsettled.
The world will continue to change. There will always be uncertainty in one form or another. The quieter question is whether your nervous system has enough experiences of safety to know that uncertainty and danger are not always the same thing. Sometimes that distinction changes everything.

When we talk about trauma, we tend to talk about events. What happened. What was said. What someone did.
But some of the experiences that shape us most are much harder to point to. Sometimes it’s about what didn’t happen.
The comfort that wasn’t offered.
The reassurance that never came.
The parent who provided everything practical, but rarely
When we talk about trauma, we tend to talk about events. What happened. What was said. What someone did.
But some of the experiences that shape us most are much harder to point to. Sometimes it’s about what didn’t happen.
The comfort that wasn’t offered.
The reassurance that never came.
The parent who provided everything practical, but rarely asked how you felt. The affection that depended on being good, quiet, successful or easy.
The adult who was physically present, but emotionally somewhere else. There may be no single event to remember. Nothing that obviously fits the story we have learned to associate with trauma. And that can make these experiences particularly difficult to understand.
Many adults struggle with the idea that something might have been missing from their childhood because, objectively, much of it was fine. They had a home. They were fed. They went to school. There were holidays, birthdays and family photographs.
Perhaps they would even describe their parents as loving. Two things can be true at once. A parent can love their child deeply and still be unable to meet some of that child's emotional needs.
Often, this isn't deliberate. Parents bring their own histories into parenting. Some grew up in families where feelings weren't discussed. Some were overwhelmed, depressed, frightened or simply doing what they had learned to do themselves.
Understanding that doesn't require blame. But it also doesn't mean the impact disappears.
Children don't sit down and analyse the emotional limitations of their environment. They adapt to it. If distress isn't met with comfort, they may learn to soothe themselves.
If expressing needs creates tension, they may learn not to have them.
If achievement brings connection, they may become very good at achieving.
If other people's emotions dominate the household, they may become exceptionally good at reading the room. Those adaptations can be incredibly effective.
So effective, in fact, that they can follow us into adulthood without ever looking like adaptations at all.
They simply feel like personality.
I'm independent.
I don't need much from people.
I'm a perfectionist.
I hate letting people down.
I'm just better at dealing with things myself.
Perhaps. But sometimes it's worth becoming curious about where those qualities were first useful.
What wasn't available to us early in life can become particularly visible when we get close to other people.
Someone may desperately want intimacy while feeling uncomfortable when another person gets too close. They may find it easier to care for a partner than to let a partner care for them.
They might interpret someone's disappointment as rejection, struggle to ask for reassurance, or feel embarrassed by perfectly ordinary emotional needs.
Others become highly self-sufficient.
They don't expect anyone to notice they're struggling because, somewhere along the way, they learned that nobody would.
None of this automatically means someone experienced emotional neglect or trauma. There isn't a checklist that can retrospectively explain a childhood, and we should be careful about turning every imperfect experience into a psychological injury.
Parents don't need to be perfectly attuned. Relationships don't need to be perfect. Childhood doesn't need to be perfect. But repeated emotional experiences do teach us things about ourselves and other people. About whether our feelings matter. Whether people stay.
Whether asking for something is safe. Whether we can rely on someone when we're vulnerable.
And those lessons can be remarkably persistent.
I think this is particularly important when talking about childhood.
Therapy doesn't need to become a courtroom in which we decide whether our parents were good or bad. Most families are far more complicated than that.
The more interesting question is often:
What did I learn about myself and relationships in the environment I grew up in?
And then:
Do I still need to live by those rules now?
Perhaps being undemanding once protected a relationship. Perhaps being useful brought connection. Perhaps staying quiet kept things calm.
Perhaps depending only on yourself meant you couldn't be disappointed.
Those strategies may have made enormous sense then. They may make considerably less sense in the life you're living now.
Not rewriting childhood.
Not recovering a perfect memory.
Not deciding that everything was traumatic. But slowly discovering that relationships can work differently. That you can express a need without becoming a burden.
That disagreement doesn't necessarily mean abandonment. That somebody else can care for you without you immediately having to repay them. That you can be loved when you're struggling as well as when you're coping.
Trauma isn't always the presence of something terrible. Sometimes the lasting impact comes from the repeated absence of something important. And because an absence leaves fewer obvious memories, it can take a long time to recognise what was missing.
Sometimes we only notice it when, much later, we finally experience something different.

Couples therapy has traditionally been viewed as something people seek when a relationship is in crisis.
An affair.
Constant arguments.
A breakdown in communication.
The sense that two people have simply grown apart.
But I wonder whether that perception is beginning to change.
Increasingly, couples seem to be seeking support before they reach b
Couples therapy has traditionally been viewed as something people seek when a relationship is in crisis.
An affair.
Constant arguments.
A breakdown in communication.
The sense that two people have simply grown apart.
But I wonder whether that perception is beginning to change.
Increasingly, couples seem to be seeking support before they reach breaking point. Not because they want someone to tell them who's right or wrong, but because they're becoming curious about the patterns they keep finding themselves in.
That feels like an important shift.
We're talking more openly about attachment, trauma, emotional regulation, and nervous systems than we were a decade ago. More people are recognising that relationships aren't simply about compatibility. They're also about the experiences each person brings with them.
At the same time, I think there's a risk in believing that every difficulty in a relationship can be explained by psychology alone.
Not every disagreement is an attachment wound.
Not every argument is a trauma response.
Sometimes people are simply different.
Sometimes relationships become strained because life becomes demanding.
And sometimes two people who care deeply about one another struggle to find each other amidst the pressures of work, parenting, finances, illness, or loss.
Equally, our earlier experiences do matter.
The ways we learned about trust, closeness, conflict, and emotional safety often find their way into adult relationships without us realising.
Not because we're choosing to repeat the past.
But because our nervous systems tend to return to what feels familiar.
Perhaps couples therapy isn't really about deciding who's causing the problem.
Perhaps it's about creating enough space for two people to become curious about what happens between them.
Less certainty.
More understanding.
Less blame.
More perspective.
Relationships are rarely built or broken by a single conversation.
They're shaped by thousands of small moments of connection, misunderstanding, repair, and change.
Perhaps that's what couples therapy offers.
Not a guarantee that every relationship will survive.
But an opportunity for two people to understand themselves, and each other, a little more deeply.

Some people say sorry constantly.
Sorry for being late. Sorry for asking a question. Sorry for needing help. Sorry for disagreeing. Sorry for crying. Sometimes even:
“Sorry for saying sorry so much.”
It can seem like politeness. A habit. Perhaps simply part of someone's personality. But sometimes, apologising has very little to do with havin
Some people say sorry constantly.
Sorry for being late. Sorry for asking a question. Sorry for needing help. Sorry for disagreeing. Sorry for crying. Sometimes even:
“Sorry for saying sorry so much.”
It can seem like politeness. A habit. Perhaps simply part of someone's personality. But sometimes, apologising has very little to do with having done something wrong.
Children learn surprisingly quickly what makes relationships feel secure. If disagreement led to anger, apologising may have ended the conflict. If a parent was easily upset, taking responsibility may have restored calm.
If affection felt conditional, being agreeable may have helped maintain connection. And if someone grew up feeling responsible for other people's emotions, saying sorry could become an almost automatic response whenever somebody seemed unhappy.
Not necessarily because they believed they were at fault. But because restoring harmony felt important.
Over time, the apology can happen before we've even considered whether one is needed.
This is where it becomes interesting.
“Sorry, can I ask you something?”
“Sorry, I'm probably being silly.”
“Sorry, I don't agree.”
“Sorry, I just need a bit of time.”
None of those things necessarily requires an apology. Yet underneath them can sit a quieter assumption:
My needs might inconvenience you.
My feelings might be too much.
Disagreeing might upset you.
Taking up space might cost me something.
The word sorry becomes a way of making ourselves slightly smaller before somebody else has the opportunity to object.
This can become particularly noticeable in adult relationships.
A partner is disappointed, so we apologise. A colleague seems irritated, so we wonder what we've done. Someone's message sounds slightly different, and we immediately start reviewing the conversation.
For some people, another person's discomfort creates an almost irresistible urge to fix things.
Even when the discomfort isn't theirs to fix. There is an important difference between:
“I've hurt you and I'm sorry.”
and
“You're unhappy, therefore I must have done something wrong.”
The first is accountability.
The second can become responsibility for emotions that belong to somebody else.
Of course, some people simply say sorry more than others.
Culture matters. Family habits matter. Personality matters. And in Britain, we can apologise to someone who has just walked into us.
So frequent apologising isn't evidence of trauma, low self-esteem or a difficult childhood. But when saying sorry sits alongside fear of conflict, people-pleasing, difficulty expressing needs or a strong sensitivity to other people's moods, it can be worth becoming curious about.
Not:
“How do I stop apologising?”
But:
“What do I think might happen if I don't?”
That question can lead somewhere quite different.
Perhaps somebody is disappointed and we allow them to be disappointed. Perhaps we disagree without softening our opinion first.
Perhaps we ask for something without explaining why we deserve it. Perhaps someone is quiet and we resist the urge to assume we've caused it.
For someone accustomed to maintaining harmony, these can feel surprisingly uncomfortable.
Because the challenge isn't really removing the word sorry from our vocabulary. It's learning that relationships can survive moments when everybody isn't happy.
None of this means we should apologise less when we've genuinely hurt someone. Being able to recognise our impact, take responsibility and repair relationships is important. But an apology means something different when it comes from choice rather than fear.
Perhaps the aim isn't to stop saying sorry. It's to notice whether we're apologising for something we've actually done
or simply apologising for having needs, feelings, opinions and boundaries of our own.
Sometimes the smallest word can reveal something much bigger about how safe we've learned it is to take up space

What will therapy look like in ten years time?
It's a question I've been thinking about more recently. The way people access support is already changing.
Online therapy is now commonplace.
AI is becoming part of mental health conversations.
Self-help content is available in seconds.
Psychological language has become part of everyday life.
What will therapy look like in ten years time?
It's a question I've been thinking about more recently. The way people access support is already changing.
Online therapy is now commonplace.
AI is becoming part of mental health conversations.
Self-help content is available in seconds.
Psychological language has become part of everyday life.
In many ways, this is positive. Support is more accessible than it has ever been. Information that was once hidden behind textbooks, training, or professional doors is now available to anyone with an internet connection.
But I don't think the future of therapy is simply about technology. I think it's about relationships.
The more connected we become digitally, the more aware I am of how many people feel disconnected emotionally.
The more information we have access to, the more people seem to be searching for spaces where they can slow down, reflect, and make sense of their experiences in the presence of another human being.
Trauma work has always reminded me that healing is rarely just about understanding.
Many people already understand why they think, feel, or react the way they do.
What they're often missing is an experience that feels different from the one they've known before. Safety. Consistency. Trust. Connection.
Whatever therapy looks like in the future, I suspect those things will remain important. The methods may evolve. The technology will certainly evolve.
But the human need to be understood, accepted, and met in relationship feels unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

We tend to think of calm as something everyone wants. A quiet weekend. Nothing urgent to deal with. A relationship that feels steady. A period where, for once, nothing seems to be going wrong.
It sounds peaceful. But for some people, it doesn’t feel that way at all. Sometimes calm feels uncomfortable.
There can be a strange restlessness whe
We tend to think of calm as something everyone wants. A quiet weekend. Nothing urgent to deal with. A relationship that feels steady. A period where, for once, nothing seems to be going wrong.
It sounds peaceful. But for some people, it doesn’t feel that way at all. Sometimes calm feels uncomfortable.
There can be a strange restlessness when life becomes quiet. A feeling that something is about to happen. An urge to stay busy, check something, solve something or find the next thing to worry about. And sometimes people feel confused by it.
“Everything is fine. So why can’t I relax?”
The answer can sometimes lie in what the nervous system has learned to expect.
If you’ve spent significant periods of your life around uncertainty, conflict, emotional volatility or threat, being alert can become useful.
You learn to notice changes in someone's mood. You listen for the shift in someone's voice. You anticipate problems before they happen. You stay prepared.
That heightened awareness isn't necessarily a conscious decision. It can become an automatic way of moving through the world. And when you've lived that way for long enough, vigilance can begin to feel more familiar than calm. Not better. Just familiar.
So when life eventually becomes quieter, the nervous system doesn't necessarily respond with relief. Sometimes it responds with suspicion.
What am I missing?
We often use the words calm and safe as though they mean the same thing. But psychologically, they can be very different.
You can be sitting in a quiet room while your body remains alert.
You can be in a loving relationship while still anticipating rejection.
You can have financial security and still struggle to stop preparing for disaster.
You can know intellectually that everything is okay while some part of you remains unconvinced. This is one of the reasons telling someone to "just relax" rarely works. The thinking part of the brain may understand that there is no immediate threat. The body may have learned something different.
This can show up in surprisingly ordinary ways. Constantly keeping busy. Checking emails when there's no need to. Finding it difficult to take a day off. Overthinking a perfectly normal interaction. Feeling uneasy when a relationship becomes stable.
Waiting for something to go wrong when life is going well.
Occasionally, people even find themselves drawn back towards situations that recreate a familiar level of intensity.
That doesn't mean they want chaos.
It means familiarity can have a powerful pull. If your system has spent years responding to intensity, the absence of intensity can initially feel strangely empty.
I think this distinction matters.
Not everyone who struggles to relax has experienced trauma. Modern life gives us plenty of other reasons to remain activated. Work, phones, notifications, financial pressure, caring responsibilities and the expectation that we should always be doing something can make genuine rest surprisingly difficult.
Personality, anxiety and learned family habits can play a role too.
But for some people, there is a deeper pattern.
They aren't simply bad at relaxing.
Their system became very good at staying ready.
We often talk about learning to tolerate difficult emotions. Less often do we talk about learning to tolerate things that are good for us.
Rest.
Consistency.
Being cared for.
Not knowing what happens next without immediately preparing for the worst. A relationship without emotional extremes. An afternoon where nothing needs fixing. For someone accustomed to vigilance, these experiences can initially create discomfort rather than relief. And that can be an important part of trauma therapy.
Not forcing the body to relax.
Not convincing someone that they're safe. But gradually creating enough experiences of safety that the nervous system no longer needs quite so much evidence.
Over time, calm can become less unfamiliar. Rest doesn't have to mean letting your guard down dangerously. Silence doesn't have to mean something bad is coming.
A stable relationship doesn't have to feel boring simply because it isn't intense. And a good period in life doesn't always need to be followed by disaster.
Perhaps that's one of the quieter parts of recovery. Not simply feeling less afraid when something goes wrong. But slowly becoming able to remain present when, for once, nothing does.
Change the Script UK